all micro contact rss

If your test is flawed, it's not up to the victim of your flawed test to correct the error

> Podjarny said Blaze would be “more than willing” to create a new report if Apple decides to apply the Web performance optimization to the embedded Web browser.
via [macworld.com](http://www.macworld.com/article/158628/2011/03/apple_blaze_browsing.html#lsrc.rss_main)
How about you test the ACTUAL Safari browser, rather than ask Apple to change its embedded browser, Blaze? You know, if you perform a study, and it gets revealed that your methods are getting erroneous data, it’s usually then up to the administrator of the test to redo the test properly. Not tell the subjects that they should conform to the test.

Talk about a desperate plea to keep an obviously bogus statistic floating around the Internet. This is as bad as the Consumer Reports nonsense.

I’ll ask again, at what point is Android going to be better at iOS at something without lying about the numbers? Details like browser speed are not even important to REAL WORLD USERS, anyway. A second here, a second there—it doesn’t matter to most people. But if you’re going to claim you’re faster, then you have to ACTUALLY BE FASTER.