all micro contact rss

We need to get rid of this notion of "bars"

As pertains to cell phones, of course, not local watering holes.

The little bars on your cell phone are an indication of signal STRENGTH, which doesn’t really give you enough information to judge much of anything. In addition to strength, there’s also signal quality, which can have as much, if not more, effect on your ability to keep a call going. The indicator on all cell phones, in addition, is not updated every second, but rather is polled at a given interval. Five seconds, fifteen seconds, thirty seconds. Whatever the case may be.

Ever look at your phone as you try to make a call, and notice that it has full bars, yet the call won’t go through? Chances are, you have a strong, but lo-quality signal. Or you don’t have a signal at all, and the indicator hasn’t been updated yet.

Or you look at your phone, and even though you’re not moving, it suddenly jumps from four bars to one? That doesn’t mean the signal cut out at that exact moment. It was probably gone a long time ago.

There are several places in San Francisco I can go where my phone will consistently show a full set of bars, but I can’t complete a call or get any data from the 3G network. There are other places where I have less than a bar and can stay on the phone with no issues.

Even if you take two equal phones and place them right next to each other, you’ll often get two different levels of “bars.”

My point is that “bars” are very, very unscientific. And yet most people, tech press included, treat a cell phone’s bars like they are a highly calibrated precision instrument.

Stop that.

The reason I bring this up is that I’ve heard a lot today about the new iPhone and whether or not it gets a better signal than the old iPhone. Many reviewers suggested that they had fewer dropped calls, and in general found their service had improved. Others mentioned that their phone had fewer “bars” than before, and therefore the new iPhone had poorer reception.

There’s no easy way to determine whether one phone gets better or worse signal in general than another, other than to make calls with it and track how well it performs in the real world over time.

Stop obsessing over “bars” and start dialing.

AppleInsider | Some iPhone 4 launch units lose signal when held with left hand

> **Some users have experienced poor signal and dropped calls when holding Apple’s new iPhone 4 in their left hand, which makes their palm cover a seam that separates the device’s two perimeter radio antennas.** > > When Apple announced the iPhone 4 [earlier this month](http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/10/06/07/apple_unveils_redesigned_thinner_iphone_4_with_two_cameras.html), the company revealed that the metal band around the outside of the device has breaks in it to allow the multiple antennas inside the device — for cellular service, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth and more — to establish connections. The larger metal piece on the right side of the phone serves as the GSM/UMTS cellular antenna, and the smaller portion on the left side is responsible for Bluetooth, Wi-Fi and GPS. > > For some, covering — or even just touching — the point where the two antennas meet on the left side of the phone can cause [loss of signal](http://www.insanely-great.com/news.php?id=11149) (via *Insanely Great Mac*) and even dropped calls. The reports suggest that the [issue is worse](http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/10/06/23/some_early_iphone_4_shipments_have_defective_screens_missing_bars.html) than the problem described by Walt Mossberg of *The Wall Street Journal*.
via [appleinsider.com](http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/10/06/24/some_iphone_4_launch_units_lose_signal_when_held_with_left_hand.html)
I’m a lefty, and I definitely have this issue with my new iPhone, but ONLY if I cup the phone in such a way with my left hand that my skin covers over the notch between the antennae. I generally don’t hold my phone that way, (I’m more of a thumb and fingers holder myself) so I don’t think it will be a problem for me.

Nevertheless, I hope Apple can fix this in software, or get the people who are affected by this new phones that don’t have this issue.

In general, my signal seems to be better than with my old iPhone 3Gs, though I’ve only had this thing for a few hours, so that’s not a scientific observation.

Droid X ships with older OS

> The [Droid X](http://phones.verizonwireless.com/droid/x/) will ship with Android 2.1, which will be updated to so-called [Froyo, or Android 2.2](http://www.macworld.com/article/150902/2010/04/android_flash.html), later. That means that it initially won’t have Flash Player 10.1, the latest version of that software that became available this week for Android 2.2. Onlookers had hoped the Droid X would come with Android 2.2. > > The phone will become available on July 15 and will get Android 2.2 and Flash Player 10.1 later in the summer, Verizon said. It will retail for $199 after a $100 rebate.
via [macworld.com](http://www.macworld.com/article/152242/2010/06/droid_x.html?lsrc=rss_main)
I’m just trying to think what the reaction would be if Apple shipped the iPhone 4 tomorrow with version 3.1.3 of the OS, instead of iOS 4. And then told people that even though many current customers already have downloaded 4 for free, that they’d have to wait until “later this summer” to get the latest OS for their shiny new phone.

Yet somehow I’m guessing Google is going to get a pass on this, as they always do.

And what’s with the jumbo phones lately on the Android side, anyway? Are they trying to limit sales to ultra-geeks with giant pockets?

White iPhone 4 officially delayed until Late July

> Those holding out hope of getting a white iPhone this month, prepare for disappointment. Apple [says](http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2010/06/23iphonestatement.html) that the white model won’t be available to users until the second half of July. It turns out the devices have “proven more challenging to manufacture than expected,” and therefore they are being delayed for at least half a month.
via [arstechnica.com](http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2010/06/apple-delays-white-iphone-4-due-to-manufacturing-challenge.ars?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss)
I had a bad feeling this was going to be the case, which is why I reserved a black one for tomorrow. Kinda sucks, because I’ve always favored the white over the black, though with this newest model, the black looks better than it ever has.

On the bright side, at least Apple finally made an official announcement about availability of the white model. I wish they had done this last week on pre-order day. That probably could have helped curb the crazy number of people trying to hit the system that day, at least just a little bit. Some may have been more willing to wait for white if they knew exactly how long the wait would be. As it stood, I just ordered the black, thinking it could easily be several months before white became available.

At least now the lines for tomorrow will be just a tiny bit shorter, since there won’t be any people waiting for hours in hopes of getting the white ones that don’t exist. Many believed Apple would have a very limited number of white ones for launch, but I never had much hope for that possibility.

You don't have to "kill" an app that isn't really running

I’ve been hearing a lot of people, particularly in the comment sections of tech news sights, complaining that they didn’t really need multitasking, and that they’re now spending all their time “killing” apps in the popup dock in order to conserve battery life.

Hate to break it to you, but Apple’s implementation here isn’t hurting your battery life. Think of those apps down there as a “recents” list, not a “currently running” list. Because unless those apps are specifically running one of the new background services (like audio playback, etc.) they aren’t “running.” They are temporarily frozen in RAM, but they are not eating processor cycles, slowing down your phone, hurting your battery, etc. In fact, any app that hasn’t been recompiled specifically for iOS4 isn’t even frozen in RAM. You don’t need to kill any of those apps, because your iPhone will kill them for you as needed. That’s the whole reason why we waited this long for Apple to implement this solution.

The only reason to “kill” one of those apps is if you specifically need it to reset itself for some reason, or if you don’t want someone else to know what you’ve been running lately. Otherwise, leave that drawer alone; the device will take care of everything for you.