Not only are all Android devices considered as "one." Now OMS and Tapas devices are "Android" too?
> That suggests most the growth in “Android” numbers is coming from no-name vendors selling devices in countries such as China, using devices that don’t support Google’s development of the OS (via ads or search services) nor even expand the platform in any meaningful way that could benefit Android users. > > Samsung, the most noteworthy Android smartphone developer and the only licensee to ship a well-known Android tablet, just [reported](http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/01/28/samsung-idINTOE70O03F20110128) its weakest profits in six quarters, and was hit by reports…